Interactive visualiser

Bolzano’s theorem

A continuous function that changes sign on [α,β][\alpha, \beta] must cross the xx-axis in between. Drag the endpoints, watch the two conditions hold or fail, and let bisection close in on the root.

Διαβάστε το στα ελληνικά →

Loading the visualiser…

Works on a phone, tablet or computer — nothing to install, no account.

The theorem

If ff is continuous on [α,β][\alpha, \beta] and f(α) f(β)<0f(\alpha)\,f(\beta) < 0, then there is at least one x0∈(α,β)x_0 \in (\alpha, \beta) with f(x0)=0f(x_0) = 0.

What you are looking at

The theorem has two conditions and one conclusion, and the picture keeps them apart. The yellow interval is [α,β][\alpha, \beta]; the chips above the graph say whether ff is continuous there and whether f(α)f(\alpha) and f(β)f(\beta) have opposite signs. When both hold, the conclusion lights up and the roots appear as green points on the axis. It says at least one: with f(x)=x3−3x+1f(x) = x^3 - 3x + 1 and a wide enough interval you will find three.

Switch to the discontinuous function and the reason for the first condition becomes visible: ff jumps from −1-1 to 11 at x=0x = 0, so it changes sign without ever being zero. Bisect shows the theorem working as a method: each step halves the interval and keeps the half where the sign still changes, so after nn steps the root is trapped in an interval of width β−α2n\dfrac{\beta - \alpha}{2^n}.

Try this

  1. 1Drag β\beta past x≈1.53x \approx 1.53. Now f(α)f(\alpha) and f(β)f(\beta) are both positive and the theorem promises nothing — yet two roots are still there. The converse of Bolzano’s theorem is false.
  2. 2Set α=−2.5\alpha = -2.5 and β=2.5\beta = 2.5: the signs differ and three roots appear. At least one really means at least one.
  3. 3Press Bisect and count the steps: each halves the interval, so after 10 steps it is about a thousandth of its first width.
  4. 4Choose Discontinuous: the endpoint values have opposite signs, but the graph jumps over the axis at x=0x = 0 and there is no root at all.

Mistakes students make

  • Checking only the signs. Without continuity on the whole closed interval the theorem says nothing: 1x\dfrac{1}{x} on [−1,1][-1, 1] changes sign and has no root.
  • Reading it backwards. A root in (α,β)(\alpha, \beta) does not need f(α)f(β)<0f(\alpha)f(\beta) < 0: f(x)=x2f(x) = x^2 on [−1,1][-1, 1] has a root, yet f(−1)f(1)=1>0f(-1)f(1) = 1 > 0.
  • Claiming exactly one root. The theorem gives existence only; for uniqueness you need more, usually that ff is strictly monotonic on the interval.

In the exam

  • In an AP free-response answer, name the theorem, state that ff is continuous on the closed interval, and give both endpoint values — the justification is marked, not just the conclusion.
  • At A-Level this is the change-of-sign method for locating roots, and questions ask when it fails: a discontinuity gives a sign change with no root, and two roots close together give a root with no sign change.

Where it is taught

  • AP Calculus AB/BC · Unit 1 (1.16, the Intermediate Value Theorem)
  • Edexcel A-Level Pure Year 2 · Numerical methods (locating roots by change of sign)
  • IB Maths AA HL · 5.12 (continuity)
  • Greek Γ΄ Λυκείου · §1.8

Teaching this?

Put this visualiser on your lesson board with one tap. Your student sees every drag, live, on their own screen — and Owlileo marks the homework, runs the tests and keeps the parents informed.

Start free →