The theorem
If near and , then .
What you are looking at
oscillates infinitely often near , so no table of values settles its limit. But gives , and both bounds tend to . The green curves are those bounds, and the working shows , and at the current point, always in that order.
The third function is the famous one: for , , and both bounds tend to , so — the limit behind the derivative of . Zooming does not change the argument; it shows why it works: the closer you look, the less room has.
Try this
- 1Press Zoom and watch the window shrink around : stays between the green curves at every scale.
- 2Switch to : the bounds are now , straight lines instead of parabolas, and the squeeze still works.
- 3Switch to : it is not defined at , yet the bounds and force the limit .
- 4Hide the formulas and answer the prediction first: does have a limit at at all?
Mistakes students make
- Using bounds that do not share a limit. is true but proves nothing: the bounds tend to and , and has no limit at .
- Writing : the product rule for limits needs both limits to exist, and the second does not.
In the exam
- Squeeze arguments and are AP Unit 1 material: state both inequalities and both limits before you conclude.
- At A-Level the small-angle approximation rests on the same limit.
Where it is taught
- AP Calculus AB/BC · Unit 1 (1.8 Squeeze Theorem)
- IB Maths AA HL · 5.12 (limits)
- Greek Γ΄ Λυκείου · §1.5
Teaching this?
Put this visualiser on your lesson board with one tap. Your student sees every drag, live, on their own screen — and Owlileo marks the homework, runs the tests and keeps the parents informed.
Start free →